WASHINGTON — Washington has decided that technology is industrial policy with better catering. On February 15, 2026, data-centre water fights showed what that decision costs anyone who is not in the room. The scene at a think-tank green room on Massachusetts Avenue was the kind of Washington tableau that looks choreographed until you watch the aides check their phones. What 39 per cent in Grand Rapids says about data-centre water fights is the polite way to describe a capital that is fighting a war, an election and a trade rupture at the same time.
The nut of it is simple, and Canadians should not dress it up. American power still sets the tempo for North America, but it is being spent with less patience and more theatre. Data-centre water fights is where that impatience showed on February 15, 2026. The Iran confrontation was still, in those weeks, a crisis with a fuse rather than a war with a body count Americans had learned to recite. Officials talked about deterrence, tankers and red lines. The Strait of Hormuz was a risk premium, not yet a nightly map.
There is always a paper trail. Staffers circulated an AI liability bill with the serial number H.R. 1639, which is how Washington pretends a political choice is a technical one. In Ways and Means, members asked questions they already knew the answers to, then left to tape hits that would be clipped before dinner. The public argument was about principle. The private argument was about 25 per cent of a slice of the map that still decides who runs the House.
"Data-centre water fights is not a messaging problem. It is a governing problem," a House Freedom Caucus member told Maclean’s. The conversation happened the way they happen now: off to the side, on background, with a glance at the door. "You can survive a bad clip. You cannot survive a month of prices that people feel in the driveway." In Grand Rapids, that sentence would not be a metaphor.
Export controls on chips are foreign policy by other means. Data centres are municipal politics with a national-security appendix. Canada wants the investment and fears the dependence. Washington wants the allied capacity and fears the leakage. In between sits a lot of water, power and tax abatement, and a workforce that will not appear because a senator clapped.







